Harris v. Johnson et al

Filing 12

RULING Adopting 10 Report and Recommendations, of the U.S. Magistrate Judge.The Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's potential state law claims and Plaintiff's federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A for failure to state a claim. If Plaintiff requests leave to amend, further leave is denied. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 8/28/2024. (EDC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA EDWARD HARRIS (#78929) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS 22-892-SDD-EWD JACOB C. JOHNSON, ETAL RULING The Court has carefully considered the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation'' of United States Magistrate Judge Erin WilderDoomes dated July 26, 2024, to which an Objection2 was filed. The Court conducted a de novo review. The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Court declines the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's potential state law claims and Plaintiffs federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยงยง 1915(e) and 1915A for failure to state a claim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED if Plaintiff requests leave to amend, further leave is denied. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on this ^- / day of August, 2024. CHIEF JUDGE^HELLY D. DICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 Rec. Doc. 10. MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 2Rec. Doc. 11.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?