Pea v. Lewis

Filing 9

RULING : Adopting the 8 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. the Court declines to exercise of supplemental jurisdiction overpotential state law claims, that all claims brought by Plaintiff Donald Pea in this case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and/or 1915A for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and 6 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction be DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Shelly D. Dick on 08/29/2024. (ELW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DONALD PEA (#457171) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS 23-35-SDD-EWD ERIC LEWIS RULING The Court has carefully considered the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation^ of United States Magistrate Erin Wilder-Doomes. dated August 9, 2024, to which no Objection has been filed The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein. ACCORDINGLY, the Court declines to exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over potential state law claims, that all claims brought by Plaintiff Donald Pea in this case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. ยงยง 1915(e) and/or 1915A for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and that Pea's Motions2 asking for preliminary injunctive relief be DENIED. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on this ^- V day of August, 2024. CHIEF JUDGE/^HELLY D. DICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1 Rec. Doc. 8. 2 Rec. Docs. 6 and 7.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?