Osman v. Sessions et al

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM ORDER: Directing plaintiff to amend petition. Pro Se Response due by 3/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 2/14/2018. (crt,Haik, K)

a
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
ABDUL MUMUNI OSMAN,
Petitioner

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-1472-P

VERSUS

JUDGE JAMES T. TRIMBLE JR.

JEFFERSON SESSIONS,
Respondent

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

MEMORANDUM ORDER
Before the Court is a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2241 by pro se Petitioner Abdul Mumuni Osman (“Osman”) (#A209159036).
Osman is an immigration detainee in the custody of the Department of Homeland
Security/U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“DHS/ICE”). He is being
detained at the LaSalle Detention Center in Jena, Louisiana.
I.

Background
Osman claims that his detention violates the rule announced in Zadvydas v.

Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), because he has been detained in excess of six months and
there is no significant likelihood of his removal in the reasonably foreseeable future.
II.

Instructions to Amend
Under Zadvydas, it is presumptively constitutional for an alien to be detained

six months past the 90-day removal period following a final order of removal. Id. After
the expiration of the six-month period, an alien may seek his release from custody by
demonstrating a “good reason to believe that there is no significant likelihood of
removal in the reasonably foreseeable future.” Agyei–Kodie v. Holder, 418 F. App’x

317, 318 (5th Cir. 2011). Not every alien in custody will be entitled to automatic
release after the expiration of the six-month period under the scheme announced in
Zadvydas.
In Andrade v. Gonzales, 459 F.3d 538 (5th Cir. 2006), the Fifth Circuit Court
of Appeals reiterated that the Supreme Court’s holding in Zadvydas creates no
specific limits on detention. In fact, an alien may be held in confinement until it has
been determined that there is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably
foreseeable future. Id. at 543 (citing Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 701). The alien bears the
initial burden of proof to show that no such likelihood of removal exists. Id.
Osman shall amend his complaint to provide a copy of the report from his latest
custody review. Osman shall also provide the reason he believes that there is no
significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable.
IT IS ORDERED that Osman amend his complaint within 30 days of the filing
of this Order to provide the information outlined above.
Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this action under
Rule 41(b) or 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioner is further
required to notify the Court of any change in his address under Rule 41.3 of the Local
Rules for the Western District of Louisiana.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED in chambers in Alexandria, Louisiana, this
14th
_______ day of February, 2018.
____________________________________
Joseph H.L. Perez-Montes
United States Magistrate Judge

2