Ahmed v. Warden et al

Filing 24

JUDGMENT adopting 22 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, dismissing with prejudice, Plaintiff's claims against Officer Timms and the Warden. Signed by Judge Terry A Doughty on 3/11/2025. (crt,Crawford, A)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
ARAFAT AHMED #A220-483-420

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:24-1111 SEC P

VERSUS

JUDGE TERRY A. DOUGHTY

WARDEN

MAG. JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 22] having been
considered, along with the Objection [Doc. No. 23] filed by Plaintiff Arafat Ahmed (“Ahmed”)
and after a de novo review of the record, agreeing with the findings of the magistrate judge under
applicable law,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that because Ahmed does not allege
a viable constitutional claim for property loss or the denial of equal protection, the claims against
Officer Timms and the Warden [Doc. Nos. 1, 16] are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Ahmed’s claims of medical care deprivation against Nurses Paula Gates, Kim Fannin, and Ali
Higgins, and his failure to protect claim against Officer Sherman, will be addressed separately.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 11th day of March 2025.

____________________________________
TERRY A. DOUGHTY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE