Lovejoy v. Warden, LA State Prison

Filing 9

ORDER: The undersigned previously recommended that the application for writ of habeas corpus be denied and the action dismissed with prejudice (doc 8 ). Failure to file written objections to the proposed factual findings and/or proposed legal conclu sions reflected in the Report and Recommendation within 14 days following the date of service of this Order shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking either the factual findings or legal conclusions accepted by the District Court, except upon grounds of plain error. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on 5/28/2013. (crt,Gregory, C)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

RUSTY GENE LOVEJOY

:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-cv-1987

VS.

:

JUDGE MINALDI

WARDEN, LOUISIANA
STATE PENITENTIARY

:

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

ORDER
The undersigned previously recommended that the application for writ of habeas corpus
be denied and the action dismissed with prejudice. Doc. 8.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, the parties have fourteen (14) days from receipt of this Order to file any objections to
the Report and Recommendation with the Clerk of Court. Timely objections will be considered
by the district judge prior to a final ruling.
Failure to file written objections to the proposed factual findings and/or the proposed
legal conclusions reflected in the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days
following the date of service of this Order shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking either the
factual findings or the legal conclusions accepted by the District Court, except upon grounds of
plain error. See Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1429–30
(5th Cir. 1996).
THUS DONE this 28th day of May, 2013.