Warner v. Aeroframe Services L L C et al

Filing 79

ORDER adopting 73 Report and Recommendations. The initial denials of remand in this matter are now supplemented to include the reasons for denial in Ashford 2 as if those reasons and that judgment adopting the reasons were reproduced in this matter in their entirety. Signed by Judge Donald E Walter on 8/10/2020. (crt,Dauterive, C)

Case 2:14-cv-00983-DEW-KK Document 79 Filed 08/10/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 4021

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

JENNY WARNER

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-cv-983

VERSUS

JUDGE DONALD E. WALTER

AEROFRAME SERVICES, LLC, ET AL.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

ORDER
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
previously filed herein, after independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the
issues, consideration of the objections filed (which provided no new bases for objection), and
having determined that the findings are correct and made under applicable law,
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is hereby ACCEPTED and
ADOPTED. The Court now supplements its ruling on subject matter jurisdiction as set forth in
the Report and Recommendation issued and adopted by the Court in 2016 (Record Documents 39
and 44) to incorporate into the finding that the Court does have subject matter jurisdiction for the
reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation issued and adopted by the Court in the related
case of Ashford v. Aeroframe Services, LLC, et al., (“Ashford 2”) bearing docket number 19-cv610. See 19-cv-610, Record Documents 62 and 69. The initial denials of remand in this matter
are now supplemented to include the reasons for denial in Ashford 2 as if those reasons and that
judgment adopting the reasons were reproduced in this matter in their entirety.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, this 10th day of August, 2020.