Warner v. Aeroframe Services L L C et al
Filing
86
JUDGMENT in case 2:14-cv-00983-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00984-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00985-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00986-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00987-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00988-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00989-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00990-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00991-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00992-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-02 323-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-02324-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-02325-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-02538-DEW-KK; adopting (85) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00983-DEW-KK; (75) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00984-DEW-KK; (76) Report and Recommendations. i n case 2:14-cv-00985-DEW-KK; (80) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00986-DEW-KK; (81) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00987-DEW-KK; (75) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00988-DEW-KK; (68) Report and Recommendati ons. in case 2:14-cv-00989-DEW-KK; (67) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00990-DEW-KK; (74) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00991-DEW-KK; (312) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00992-DEW-KK; (62) Report and Recom mendations. in case 2:14-cv-02323-DEW-KK; (63) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-02324-DEW-KK; (64) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-02325-DEW-KK granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment is rendered in favor of Aviation Technical Services ("ATS") and against all plaintiffs, Aeroframe Services L L C, ("Aeroframe") and Roger Porter dismissing all claims against A T S with prejudice. The motion is denied to the extent i t sought dismissal of plaintiffs' claims against Aeroframe. Upon reconsideration of the previous ruling in 2:14-cv-0992, doc 85, ruling at doc 104 and judgment at doc 105, and finding that the motion should now be GRANTED, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment be and it is hereby rendered in favor or Michael Ashford against Aeroframe Services L L C in the amount of $35,200. Signed by Judge Donald E Walter on 6/9/2021. (crt,Crick, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
MICHAEL ASHFORD
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-cv-610
c/w/ 14-cv-983, 14-cv-984,
14-cv-985, 14-cv-986, 14-cv-987,
14-cv-988, 14-cv-989, 14-cv-990,
14-cv-991, 14-cv-992, 14-cv-2323,
14-cv-2324, 14-cv-2325, and
14-cv-2538
:
JUDGE DONALD E. WALTER
:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY
:
:
VERSUS
AEROFRAME SERVICES, LLC, ET. AL.
JUDGMENT
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 111] of the Magistrate
Judge previously filed herein and after an independent review of the record, a de novo
determination of the issues, and consideration of the objections filed herein, and having determined
that the findings are correct under applicable law;
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 92] filed by Aviation
Technical Services, Inc. (“ATS”), be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is
denied as to ATS’s request that all claims of all plaintiffs against defendant Aeroframe Services,
LLC.be dismissed. With respect to the remainder of the motion, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that all claims of ALL PLAINTIFFS in
these consolidated cases, AEROFRAME SERVICES, LLC, and ROGER PORTER against
AVIATION TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., be and the same are hereby DISMISSED with
prejudice, all costs to be assessed to the parties whose claims have been dismissed. The “All
Plaintiffs” against whom judgment is rendered are identified by consolidated case number and
name as:
14-cv-00983
Jenny Warner
14-cv-00984
Lawrence Adams, Timothy Cowan, Joseph Debartola,
Kathleen Debartola, Karen W. DeJean, Eric Drayton,
Frank Hayes, Diana D. Pena, Gerald K. Rather, Tracy
Reed, and Allison Williams
14-cv-00985
Don Boring, Emily Grimmett, Jay Abbott, Ronnie
Orgeron, and Nathan M. Scalisi
14-cv-00986
Timothy Cleaves, Michael J. Daigle, Mohammad
Elbjeirmi, Joseph Hein, Derrick Roberson, Eric Rogillio,
and Amy Sarver
14-cv00987
Keith Cooley, Kouri Donahoo, Donald R. Hebert, Jake
Maniscalco, Eric R. Martin, Elmer Dewayne Nick, Jr.,
Roger Ladell Paris, Jason Soileau, John Upmeyer, Carl
Ward, and Jonathan Wilson
14-cv-00988
Harold J. Gallow, Melissa Lyons, Irma Chapman,
Christine Quebodeaux, Dustin Regan, Angella M.
Guarjarcle, Sonita Joseph, Jason Fruge, Donald B. Dupre,
Kristy David, Robbie W. Ellis, and Clint Thibodeaux
14-cv-00989
Joey T. Decolongon, Bridgette King, Craig LaFleur,
Christopher Meche, Jared Roberson, and Clara Roy
14-cv-00990
Ronald Blanton, Tom France, Dustin Gilley, Michael
Heath, Richard D. Holt, Sean Hudnall, Holly Labove,
Robert Lafleur, Michael McCloud, Philip Wells, Ramil
Ivan R. Decena, Shirley A. Olivier, Sandra Peak, and
Carolyn Manson
14-cv-00991
Robert Rackard
14-cv-00992
Michael Ashford (that docket number referred to
throughout this proceeding as “Ashford 1,” predecessor to
the docket number in which this judgment is rendered)
14-cv-02323
Brian Morvant and Gordon St. Germain
14-cv-02324
Robert Coley, Morris W. Domingue, Lindsay Halpin,
Troy Hayes, Vernon Holzknecht, Simona LaSalle, Alfred
Mueller and Richard Theriot
14-cv-02325
Cory Cogdill, Howard Guillory, Jesse Plumber, and Keith
Plumber
14-cv-02538
Mario Barreda, Myra B. Bourque, Danny Lee Bush,
Brendan Callahan, Karen Chasson, Antonio Chavez,
Barron Clark, Cynthia Davidson, Darick Davidson,
Michael P. Elenbaas, Michael Fontenot, Patrick Gaynor,
Judy Marceaux, Kenneth Miller, Geoffrey Omeara,
Stephen Robinson, George Santarina, and Franklin K.
Welch
Upon reconsideration of the previous ruling denying plaintiff Michael Ashford’s Motion
for Summary Judgment [14-cv-992, doc. 85, ruling at doc. 104] and finding that motion should
now be GRANTED, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment be and it is hereby rendered
in favor of MICHAEL ASHFORD against AEROFRAME SERVICES, LLC, in the amount of
THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED AND 0/100 ($35,200) DOLLARS, with
judicial interest thereon from date of judicial demand until paid, representing unpaid wages in the
amount of $2,640; a penalty of $23,760; and attorney fees of $8,800.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers this 9th day of June, 2021.
_______________________________________
DONALD E. WALTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?