Warner v. Aeroframe Services L L C et al

Filing 86

JUDGMENT in case 2:14-cv-00983-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00984-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00985-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00986-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00987-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00988-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00989-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00990-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00991-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-00992-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-02 323-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-02324-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-02325-DEW-KK; 2:14-cv-02538-DEW-KK; adopting (85) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00983-DEW-KK; (75) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00984-DEW-KK; (76) Report and Recommendations. i n case 2:14-cv-00985-DEW-KK; (80) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00986-DEW-KK; (81) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00987-DEW-KK; (75) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00988-DEW-KK; (68) Report and Recommendati ons. in case 2:14-cv-00989-DEW-KK; (67) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00990-DEW-KK; (74) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00991-DEW-KK; (312) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-00992-DEW-KK; (62) Report and Recom mendations. in case 2:14-cv-02323-DEW-KK; (63) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-02324-DEW-KK; (64) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:14-cv-02325-DEW-KK granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment is rendered in favor of Aviation Technical Services ("ATS") and against all plaintiffs, Aeroframe Services L L C, ("Aeroframe") and Roger Porter dismissing all claims against A T S with prejudice. The motion is denied to the extent i t sought dismissal of plaintiffs' claims against Aeroframe. Upon reconsideration of the previous ruling in 2:14-cv-0992, doc 85, ruling at doc 104 and judgment at doc 105, and finding that the motion should now be GRANTED, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment be and it is hereby rendered in favor or Michael Ashford against Aeroframe Services L L C in the amount of $35,200. Signed by Judge Donald E Walter on 6/9/2021. (crt,Crick, S)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION MICHAEL ASHFORD : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-cv-610 c/w/ 14-cv-983, 14-cv-984, 14-cv-985, 14-cv-986, 14-cv-987, 14-cv-988, 14-cv-989, 14-cv-990, 14-cv-991, 14-cv-992, 14-cv-2323, 14-cv-2324, 14-cv-2325, and 14-cv-2538 : JUDGE DONALD E. WALTER : MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY : : VERSUS AEROFRAME SERVICES, LLC, ET. AL. JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 111] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein and after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, and consideration of the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 92] filed by Aviation Technical Services, Inc. (“ATS”), be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is denied as to ATS’s request that all claims of all plaintiffs against defendant Aeroframe Services, LLC.be dismissed. With respect to the remainder of the motion, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that all claims of ALL PLAINTIFFS in these consolidated cases, AEROFRAME SERVICES, LLC, and ROGER PORTER against AVIATION TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., be and the same are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, all costs to be assessed to the parties whose claims have been dismissed. The “All Plaintiffs” against whom judgment is rendered are identified by consolidated case number and name as: 14-cv-00983 Jenny Warner 14-cv-00984 Lawrence Adams, Timothy Cowan, Joseph Debartola, Kathleen Debartola, Karen W. DeJean, Eric Drayton, Frank Hayes, Diana D. Pena, Gerald K. Rather, Tracy Reed, and Allison Williams 14-cv-00985 Don Boring, Emily Grimmett, Jay Abbott, Ronnie Orgeron, and Nathan M. Scalisi 14-cv-00986 Timothy Cleaves, Michael J. Daigle, Mohammad Elbjeirmi, Joseph Hein, Derrick Roberson, Eric Rogillio, and Amy Sarver 14-cv00987 Keith Cooley, Kouri Donahoo, Donald R. Hebert, Jake Maniscalco, Eric R. Martin, Elmer Dewayne Nick, Jr., Roger Ladell Paris, Jason Soileau, John Upmeyer, Carl Ward, and Jonathan Wilson 14-cv-00988 Harold J. Gallow, Melissa Lyons, Irma Chapman, Christine Quebodeaux, Dustin Regan, Angella M. Guarjarcle, Sonita Joseph, Jason Fruge, Donald B. Dupre, Kristy David, Robbie W. Ellis, and Clint Thibodeaux 14-cv-00989 Joey T. Decolongon, Bridgette King, Craig LaFleur, Christopher Meche, Jared Roberson, and Clara Roy 14-cv-00990 Ronald Blanton, Tom France, Dustin Gilley, Michael Heath, Richard D. Holt, Sean Hudnall, Holly Labove, Robert Lafleur, Michael McCloud, Philip Wells, Ramil Ivan R. Decena, Shirley A. Olivier, Sandra Peak, and Carolyn Manson 14-cv-00991 Robert Rackard 14-cv-00992 Michael Ashford (that docket number referred to throughout this proceeding as “Ashford 1,” predecessor to the docket number in which this judgment is rendered) 14-cv-02323 Brian Morvant and Gordon St. Germain 14-cv-02324 Robert Coley, Morris W. Domingue, Lindsay Halpin, Troy Hayes, Vernon Holzknecht, Simona LaSalle, Alfred Mueller and Richard Theriot 14-cv-02325 Cory Cogdill, Howard Guillory, Jesse Plumber, and Keith Plumber 14-cv-02538 Mario Barreda, Myra B. Bourque, Danny Lee Bush, Brendan Callahan, Karen Chasson, Antonio Chavez, Barron Clark, Cynthia Davidson, Darick Davidson, Michael P. Elenbaas, Michael Fontenot, Patrick Gaynor, Judy Marceaux, Kenneth Miller, Geoffrey Omeara, Stephen Robinson, George Santarina, and Franklin K. Welch Upon reconsideration of the previous ruling denying plaintiff Michael Ashford’s Motion for Summary Judgment [14-cv-992, doc. 85, ruling at doc. 104] and finding that motion should now be GRANTED, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment be and it is hereby rendered in favor of MICHAEL ASHFORD against AEROFRAME SERVICES, LLC, in the amount of THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED AND 0/100 ($35,200) DOLLARS, with judicial interest thereon from date of judicial demand until paid, representing unpaid wages in the amount of $2,640; a penalty of $23,760; and attorney fees of $8,800. THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers this 9th day of June, 2021. _______________________________________ DONALD E. WALTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?