Autin v. Cooley et al

Filing 88

JUDGMENT adopting 86 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. 72] be DENIED, that the defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. 58] be GRANTED, and that the remaining claims in this matter be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs Motion to Compel [doc. 81] and Motion for Subpoena [doc. 82] be DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge James D Cain, Jr on 3/6/2020. (crt,Benoit, T)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

TROY ADAM AUTIN #452745

CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01035 SEC P

VERSUS

JUDGE JAMES D. CAIN, JR.

TERRY COOLEY ET AL

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [doc. 86] of the
Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record,
determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the
objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record;
IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. 72] be
DENIED, that the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. 58] be GRANTED,
and that the remaining claims in this matter be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion to Compel [doc. 81] and
Motion for Subpoena [doc. 82] be DENIED AS MOOT.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers on this 6th day of March, 2020.

_________________________________________
JAMES D. CAIN, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE