InPwr Inc v. Olson Restoration L L C et al

Filing 246

JUDGMENT adopting 239 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, denying 134 Motion to Dismiss third party demands of Expedited Service Partners L L C. Granting in part and denying in part 129 Motion to Dismiss, filed by D C M C L L C. Count one and count two of the third-party-demands of Expedited Service Partners L L C against D C M C are dismissed with prejudice; the motion is otherwise denied. Signed by Judge Terry A Doughty on 11/17/2022. (crt,Crawford, A)

Download PDF
Case 2:21-cv-00821-TAD-KK Document 246 Filed 11/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 4979 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION INPWR, INC. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-CV-0821 VERSUS : JUDGE TERRY A. DOUGHTY OLSON RESTORATION, LLC, ET AL. : MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY JUDGMENT The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 239] having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 134] brought by the Lemoine Company, LLC, seeking dismissal of the third-party demands of Expedited Service Partners, LLC [Doc. No. 113] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 129] brought by DCMC, LLC a/k/a DCMC Partners is GRANTED IN PART such that Count One “Intentional Tort” and Count Two “Negligent Professional Undertaking” of the third-party demands of Expedited Service Partners, LLC [Doc. No. 113] against DCMC is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that DCMC’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 129] is otherwise DENIED. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 17th day of November 2022. _____________________________________ TERRY A. DOUGHTY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?