Degrate v. Toney et al

Filing 8

JUDGMENT to the extent ADOPTED 5 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons stated in the Court's Ruling 7 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's requests to enjoin the 65 individuals listed in his complaint as co-plaintiffs and to obtain class-action certification are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's civil rights complaint seeking injunctive relief is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as MOOT. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 5/11/09. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION WILLIAM EARL DeGRATE VERSUS SHERIFF ROYCE TONEY, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1943 JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation ofthe Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 5], to the extent ADOPTED, and for the reasons stated in the Court's Ruling, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's requests to join the 65 individuals listed in his complaint as co-plaintiffs and to obtain class-action certification are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's civil rights complaint seeking injunctive relief is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as MOOT. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 11th day of May, 2009.