CenturyTel of Chatham L L C et al v. Sprint Communications Company L P

Filing 214

JUDGMENT entered in favor of the Century Link Plaintiffs and against Defendant/Counterclaimant Sprint Communications Company L P in the amount of $8,755,402.46 for access charges, late payment fees of $3,805,343.00 as of February 2, 2016, and additional fees accrued since that date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the CenturyLink Plaintiffs are AWARDED attorneys fees, costs, and prejudgment interest. Plaintiffs shall make appropriate filings within 14 days in sup port of attorneys fees, costs, and prejudgment interest. Sprint shall have 14 days from the date of the CenturyLink Plaintiffs filings to file an opposition memorandum. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions and evidentiary objections not addressed in the Courts Ruling are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 5/4/16. (crt,Crawford, A)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
CENTURYTEL OF CHATHAM,
LLC, ET AL.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1951

VERSUS

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
COMPANY, L.P.

MAG. JUDGE MARK HORNSBY
JUDGMENT

For the reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment is hereby entered in
favor of the CenturyLink Plaintiffs and against Defendant/Counterclaimant Sprint Communications
Company, L.P. (“Sprint”) in the amount of $8,755,402.46 for access charges, late payment fees of
$3,805,343.00 as of February 2, 2016, and additional fees accrued since that date.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the CenturyLink
Plaintiffs are AWARDED attorneys’ fees, costs, and prejudgment interest. The CenturyLink
Plaintiffs shall make appropriate filings within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Judgment in
support of attorneys’ fees, costs, and prejudgment interest. Sprint shall have fourteen (14) days from
the date of the CenturyLink Plaintiffs’ filings to file an opposition memorandum.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions and evidentiary objections not
addressed in the Court’s Ruling are DENIED AS MOOT.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 4th day of May, 2016.