Wright v. H & R Block

Filing 20

ORDER granting 19 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 3/1/2011. (crt,Alexander, E)

Download PDF
Wright v. H & R Block Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION STACY C. WRIGHT VERSUS H & R BLOCK CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-00357 JUDGE ELIZABETH ERNY FOOTE MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES ORDER Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss [Record Document 19] filed on behalf of the Defendant, H&R Block Eastern Enterprises, Inc. ("Defendant"). On January 13, 2011, the Court granted W. Michael Street's motion for leave to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff Stacy Wright ("Plaintiff"). [Record Document 14]. Upon granting Mr. Smith's motion, the Court ordered Plaintiff to "enroll new counsel, file WRITTEN notice of intent to proceed pro se, or dismiss her claims" within 30 days. Id. To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's order and has given no indication that she intends to proceed with her claims against Defendant. Accordingly, upon due consideration, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss [Record Document 19] be and is hereby GRANTED, and that, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court's inherent power to control its own docket, see Link v. Wabash RR Co., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386 (1962), Plaintiff's claims be and are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Dockets.Justia.com THUS DONE AND SIGNED on this 1st day of March, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?