Smith v. Hastings Fiber Glass Products Inc et al

Filing 78

JUDGMENT adopting Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 74 , and for those additional reasons set forth in the Court's Ruling 77 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the amended complaint-in-intervention [Doc. No. 65] filed by N ewton B. Schwartz, Sr. (Schwartz) be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Schwartzs voluntary motion for partial dismissal [Doc. No. 75] is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 6/11/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
TYSON SMITH

*

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0894

VERSUS

*

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

HASTINGS FIBER GLASS
PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL.

*

MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT
The Court having considered and found that the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted, and for
those additional reasons set forth in the Court’s Ruling,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the amended complaint-inintervention [Doc. No. 65] filed by Newton B. Schwartz, Sr. (“Schwartz”) be DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Schwartz’s voluntary motion for partial dismissal
[Doc. No. 75] is DENIED AS MOOT.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 11th day of June, 2014.