Clark et al v. Marx et al

Filing 19

JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling 18 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs Eddie Clark and Byrd Minter's claims under 42 U.S.C. 1973c are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t hat Plaintiffs' 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, contained in their Motion for an Expedited Hearing Schedule and Hearing to Issue Preliminary Injunctions and Remedial Orders, is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 1/9/12. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
EDDIE CLARK AND BYRD MINTER

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-2149

VERSUS

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

JAY MARX, ET AL.

MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Ruling,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs Eddie Clark and Byrd
Minter’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1973c are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as MOOT.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, contained in
their Motion for an Expedited Hearing Schedule and Hearing to Issue Preliminary Injunctions and
Remedial Orders [Doc. No. 2], is DENIED.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 9th day of January, 2012.