Scott v. Social Security Administration

Filing 33

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 29 Report and Recommendation; GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Petition is GRANTED to the extent that the Commissioner shall remit to Plaintiff's counsel a check made payable to Plain tiff Roy Terry Scott for attorney's fees in the amount of $5,790.00 (38.6 hours at $150.00 per hour) plus expenses of $46.05. The Petition is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's additional request for attorney's fees, contained in his objections 30 to the Report and Recommendation is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 6/27/13. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION ROY TERRY SCOTT * CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-0730 VERSUS * JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES CAROLYN COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION * MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES JUDGMENT The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Petition for Attorney Fees [Doc. No. 25] is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Petition is GRANTED to the extent that the Commissioner shall remit to Plaintiff’s counsel a check made payable to Plaintiff Roy Terry Scott for attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,790.00 (38.6 hours at $150.00 per hour) plus expenses of $46.05. The Petition is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s additional request for attorney’s fees, contained in his objections [Doc. No. 30] to the Report and Recommendation is DENIED. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 27th day of June, 2013.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?