Angus Chemical Co v. Glendora Plantation Inc

Filing 133

ORDER granting 132 Motion To Certify Pursuant to Rule 54(b). Signed by Judge Robert G James on 4/28/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION ANGUS CHEMICAL COMPANY CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-1656 VERSUS JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES GLENDORA PLANTATION, INC. MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES JUDGMENT Pending before the Court is Defendant and Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim Glendora Plantation, Inc.’s (“Glendora”) “Unopposed Motion to Certify Pursuant to Rule 54(b)” [Doc. No. 132]. Having considered the motion and having found, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), that there is no just reason to delay the appeal of the contested rulings given the parties’ settlement of the remaining claims, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Glendora’s motion is GRANTED, and the following judgment and orders are certified as final and judgment is entered, pursuant to Rule 54(b): (1) The November 13, 2013 Judgment [Doc. No. 87] granting the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 40] filed by Angus Chemical Company (“Angus”) and denying the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 50] filed by Glendora; (2) The November 20, 2013 Order [Doc. No. 88] denying the Appeal of the Magistrate Judge’s Decision to the District Judge [Doc. No. 62] filed by Glendora; and (3) The Magistrate Judge’s April 22, 2013 Memorandum Order [Doc. No. 56] denying the Motion to compel First Supplemental Discovery Responses from Angus [Doc. 23] filed by Glendora. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 28th day of April, 2014. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?