Williamson v. Premier Tugs, LLC

Filing 139

JUDGMENT: For the reasons discussed in this Courts Ruling 138 and for the additional reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 120], to the extent adopted by the Court, and after a de novo review of the rec ord, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that third-party defendant Caillou Island Towing Company, Inc.s (Caillou) Cross Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 94] is GRANTED. New Techs claim for defense and indemnity from Caillou is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and its Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 85] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 2/10/16. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
JONATHAN SCOTT WILLIAMSON

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-2277

VERSUS

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

PREMIER TUGS, LLC

MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES
JUDGMENT

For the reasons discussed in this Court’s Ruling and for the additional reasons stated in the
Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 120], to the extent adopted by the
Court, and after a de novo review of the record,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that third-party defendant Caillou Island
Towing Company, Inc.’s (“Caillou”) Cross Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 94] is
GRANTED. New Tech’s claim for defense and indemnity from Caillou is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE, and its Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 85] is DENIED.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 10th day of February, 2016.