Washington v. Tubls et al

Filing 85

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 82 Report and Recommendation re 78 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion for Summary Judgment and Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Major Tubbs and Lt. Coleman i s GRANTED, that Plaintiff's Complaint 1 14 and 15 against Defendant Coleman is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety, and that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Tubbs for failure to provide medical care and for loss of property be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Defendant Tubbs remains pending. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 6/2/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION RUDOLPH WASHINGTON LA. DOC #308049 CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0217 SECTION P VERSUS JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES MAJOR TUBBS AND LT. COLEMAN MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES JUDGMENT The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is correct, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion for Summary Judgment and Partial Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 78] filed by Defendants Major Tubbs and Lt. Coleman is GRANTED, that Plaintiff’s Complaint [Doc. Nos. 1, 14, 15] against Defendant Coleman is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety, and that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Tubbs for failure to provide medical care and for loss of property be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendant Tubbs remains pending. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 2nd day of June, 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?