Greenup v. Lee et al

Filing 113

JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation 108 of the Magistrate Judge, to the extent adopted by the Court, and for those additional reasons set forth in this Courts Ruling 112 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that De fendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 96] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the extent that Defendants move for dismissal of the claims against Defendant Captain Gerald McMurray (McMurray) and for dismissal of Plaintiff Levi Greenups (Greenup) request for injunctive relief, the motion is GRANTED. All claims against McMurray are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Greenups request for injunctive relief is also DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as MOOT. The motion is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 2/20/15. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
LEVI GREENUP

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0392

VERSUS

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

CHAD LEE, ET AL.

MAG. JUDGE JAMES D. KIRK
JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to the
extent adopted by the Court, and for those additional reasons set forth in this Court’s Ruling,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants’ Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 96] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the
extent that Defendants move for dismissal of the claims against Defendant Captain Gerald
McMurray (“McMurray”) and for dismissal of Plaintiff Levi Greenup’s (“Greenup”) request for
injunctive relief, the motion is GRANTED. All claims against McMurray are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE. Greenup’s request for injunctive relief is also DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE as MOOT. The motion is otherwise DENIED.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 20th day of February, 2015.