Williams v. Johnson

Filing 39

MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 38 Motion for Reconsideration of 36 Order on Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 04/30/2014. (crt,Yocum, M)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION LAWRENCE WILLIAMS * CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0478 VERSUS * JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES ANTONIO JOHNSON * MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES MEMORANDUM ORDER Before the court is a motion for reconsideration [doc. # 38] filed by plaintiff pro se, Lawrence Williams. [doc. # 38]. By this motion, plaintiff petitions the court to reconsider its supposed April 16, 2014, judgment in favor of defendant. However, the sole order/judgment entered by the court on April 16, 2014, was an order granting defendant permission to file a reply memorandum in support of his pending motion for summary judgment. See April 16, 2014, Order [doc. # 36]). The order did not grant defendant’s pending motion for summary judgment. In fact, by separate report and recommendation issued this date, the undersigned has recommended that the District Court deny defendant’s motion for summary judgment. In sum, plaintiff’s instant motion is unsupported and without merit. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration [doc. # 38] is hereby DENIED.1 In chambers, at Monroe, Louisiana, this 30th day of April 2014. __________________________________ KAREN L. HAYES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 As this motion is not excepted within 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), nor dispositive of any claim on the merits within the meaning of Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this order is issued under the authority thereof, and in accordance with the standing order of this court. Any appeal must be made to the district judge in accordance with Rule 72(a) and LR 74.1(W).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?