Farrar v. Louisiana Dept of State Parks et al

Filing 25

JUDGMENT: The Court previously issued a Ruling [Doc. No 23] and Judgment [Doc. No 24] on the above captioned matter, dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff Russell A. Farrars claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 200 0e, et seq. The Court further indicated its intent to dismiss Plaintiffs claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 if Plaintiff did not file a memorandum in opposition within 14 days of the October 6, 2014 Ruling. Plaintiff failed to timely file an opposition memorandum. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 11/3/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION RUSSELL A. FARRAR CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0930 VERSUS JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES STATE OF LOUISIANA, OFFICE OF STATE PARKS, ET AL. MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES JUDGMENT The Court previously issued a Ruling [Doc. No 23] and Judgment [Doc. No 24] on the above captioned matter, dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff Russell A. Farrar’s claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. The Court further indicated its intent to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 if Plaintiff did not file a memorandum in opposition within 14 days of the October 6, 2014 Ruling. Plaintiff failed to timely file an opposition memorandum. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 3rd day of November, 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?