Bolden v. Cox et al

Filing 40

JUDGMENT: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judges Report and R ecommendation is correct, and for those additional reasons stated in this Courts Ruling 39 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 30] filed by Defendants Sergeant ONeal, Captain Brooks, Deputy Williams, and Lieutenant McCloud is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs claims against said Defendants are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 12/10/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
JAMES L. BOLDEN, JR.

*

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-1612
Section P

VERSUS

*

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

LARRY COX, ET AL.

*

MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered,
together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of
the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is correct, and for
those additional reasons stated in this Court’s Ruling,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion for Summary
Judgment [Doc. No. 30] filed by Defendants Sergeant O’Neal, Captain Brooks, Deputy
Williams, and Lieutenant McCloud is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s claims against said Defendants
are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 10th day of December, 2014.