Higginbotham v. Tensas Detention Center

Filing 9

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 6 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Bobby D Higginbotham, be DISMISSED WITH PRJEUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 8 Motion for Second Supplement to Writ of Habeas Corpus is granted in part and denied in part. To the extent that Petitioner sought to supplement the record, the motion is GRANTED. To the extnet that Petitioner moved for a hearing, the motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 8/26/13. (crt,Crawford, A)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
BOBBY D. HIGGINBOTHAM

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2114

VERSUS

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

STATE OF LOUISIANA

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES
JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, determining that the
findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the objections to the Report and
Recommendation in the record,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action filed as a Petition
for Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), be DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s “Motion for Second Supplement to Writ
of Habeas Corpus” [Doc. No. 8] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the
extent that Petitioner sought to supplement the record with additional argument and the attached
documents, the motion is GRANTED. To the extent that Petitioner moved for a hearing in this
matter, the motion is DENIED.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 26th day of August, 2013.