Burke v. Cox et al

Filing 22

JUDGMENT: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections there to having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 19] is GRANTED IN PART, and that Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Captain Brooks are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in their entirety. The Motion for Summary Judgment is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FUR THER ORDERED that this matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge to hold an evidentiary hearing (to include all witnesses and evidence to be presented by all remaining parties), and thereafter, to issue findings to the court, via report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 5/30/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION GILBERT BURKE * CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2154 VERSUS * JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES SHERIFF LARRY G. COX, ET AL. * MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES JUDGMENT The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 19] is GRANTED IN PART, and that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Captain Brooks are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in their entirety. The Motion for Summary Judgment is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge to hold an evidentiary hearing (to include all witnesses and evidence to be presented by all remaining parties), and thereafter, to issue findings to the court, via report and recommendation. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 30th day of May, 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?