Francis v. Tensas Parish Detention Center et al

Filing 33

JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth in the Court's Ruling 32 and for those reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 29 , to the extent adopted, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment 18 filed by Defendants Helen Leonard, Sheila Jefferson, and Dianne Taylor is DENIED, and this matter is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to hold an evidentiary hearing on exhaustion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's claims a gainst Defendants Tensas Parish Detention Center and Medical Department Tensas Parish Detention Center are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that "unknown nurses" are hereby STRICKEN as Defendants. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 5/29/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
ROBERT NATHANIEL FRANCIS

:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2954

VERSUS

:

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

TENSAS PARISH DETENTION
CENTER, ET AL.

:

MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT
For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Ruling and for those reasons set forth in
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to the extent adopted,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 18] filed by
Defendants Helen Leonard, Sheila Jefferson, and Dianne Taylor is DENIED, and this matter is
REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to hold an evidentiary hearing on exhaustion.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s claims
against Defendants Tensas Parish Detention Center and Medical Department Tensas Parish
Detention Center are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “unknown night shift nurses” are hereby STRICKEN
as Defendants.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 29th day of May, 2014.