Fruge v. Cox

Filing 36

JUDGMENT ADOPTING Report and Recommendation 33 , granting 25 Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Complaint 1 8 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, but DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 USC 1915. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 3/4/15. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION ZENAS FRUGE LA. DOC #438045 CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0153 SECTION P VERSUS JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES LARRY COX, ET AL. MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES JUDGMENT The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections and responses thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 25], is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint [Doc. Nos. 1, 8] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, but DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 4th day of March, 2015.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?