Fruge v. Cox
Filing
36
JUDGMENT ADOPTING Report and Recommendation 33 , granting 25 Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Complaint 1 8 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, but DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 USC 1915. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 3/4/15. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
ZENAS FRUGE
LA. DOC #438045
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0153
SECTION P
VERSUS
JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES
LARRY COX, ET AL.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES
JUDGMENT
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered,
together with the written objections and responses thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de
novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is
correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment [Doc. No. 25], is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint [Doc. Nos. 1, 8] is
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, but
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 4th day of March, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?