Melchiory v. Holder et al

Filing 16

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 14 Report and Recommendation.GRANTING 11 Motion to Dismiss, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 6/25/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION GOODLUCK MAFFIKIRI MELCHIORY * CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0169 VERSUS * JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES ERIC HOLDER, JR., ET AL. * MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES JUDGMENT The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, DECREED that Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 11] is hereby GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 25th day of June, 2014. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION GOODLUCK MAFFIKIRI MELCHIORY * CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0169 Section P VERSUS * JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES ERIC HOLDER, JR., ET AL. * MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES JUDGMENT The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted, IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s motion to dismiss [doc. # 11] is hereby GRANTED, and that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). THUS DONE AND SIGNED this ______ day of _____________________ 2014, Monroe, Louisiana. __________________________________ ROBERT G. JAMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?