Melchiory v. Holder et al
Filing
16
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 14 Report and Recommendation.GRANTING 11 Motion to Dismiss, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 6/25/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
GOODLUCK MAFFIKIRI
MELCHIORY
*
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0169
VERSUS
*
JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES
ERIC HOLDER, JR., ET AL.
*
MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES
JUDGMENT
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no
objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record
in this matter,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, DECREED that Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc.
No. 11] is hereby GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 25th day of June, 2014.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
GOODLUCK MAFFIKIRI
MELCHIORY
*
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0169
Section P
VERSUS
*
JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES
ERIC HOLDER, JR., ET AL.
*
MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES
JUDGMENT
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered,
together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of
the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that
judgment as recommended therein is warranted,
IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s motion to dismiss [doc. # 11] is hereby GRANTED,
and that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1).
THUS DONE AND SIGNED this ______ day of _____________________ 2014,
Monroe, Louisiana.
__________________________________
ROBERT G. JAMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?