Caston v. David Wade Correctional Center
Filing
8
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendation re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jesse James Caston. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, insofar as it raises a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, be deemed second and successive and DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction because petitioner did not obtain permission from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals prior to filing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED , AND DECREED that this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, insofar as it claims ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel, be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 6/27/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
JESSE JAMES CASTON
LA. DOC #101028
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0885
VERSUS
JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES
WARDEN JERRY GOODWIN
MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES
JUDGMENT
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and
after an independent review of the record including the objections filed by petitioner, and having
determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus, insofar as it raises a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, be deemed
second and successive and DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction because petitioner did not obtain
permission from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals prior to filing.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Petition for
Writ of Habeas Corpus, insofar as it claims ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel, be
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 27th day of June, 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?