Luv N Care Ltd v. Groupo Rimar

Filing 24

JUDGMENT: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 11] having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED that the moti on to dismiss for insufficient service of process, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5) [Doc. No. 5], filed by defendant Groupo Rimar, AKA Suavinex, SA is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs prior service attempt, reflected in [Doc. No. 4] is QUASHED. Plaintiff shall proceed to serve defendant in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 12/9/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION LUV N’ CARE, LTD CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2491 VERSUS JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES GROUPO RIMAR, AKA SUAVINEX MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES JUDGMENT The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 11] having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5) [Doc. No. 5], filed by defendant Groupo Rimar, AKA Suavinex, SA is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s prior service attempt, reflected in [Doc. No. 4] is QUASHED. Plaintiff shall proceed to serve defendant in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 9th day of December, 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?