Bell v. L P Brown Co Inc
Filing
29
JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling 28 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's 6 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant L.P. Brown Company, Inc's counterclaims is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 2/2/15. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
CHARLES S. BELL
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-02772
VERSUS
JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES
L.P. BROWN COMPANY, INC.
MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES
JUDGMENT
For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Ruling,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Charles S. Bell’s Motion
for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 6] is GRANTED. The forum selection clause contained in the
non-compete agreement between the parties is DECLARED null and void under LA. REV. STAT.
23:921A(2). Under Louisiana law, the non-compete agreement is geographically overbroad and
is thus DECLARED unenforceable.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant L.P.
Brown Company, Inc.’s counterclaim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 2nd day of February, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?