Wright v. LeBlanc et al

Filing 14

JUDGMENT adopting in part 8 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. ORDER granting 10 Motion to Amend Complaint. ORDER denying 12 Motion to Appoint Counsel. ORDER Dismissing with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to st ate a claim, Plaintiff's claims, EXCEPT his excessive force claim. ORDER denying 11 Motion for Request for Production of Documents. ORDER REMANDING case to the Magistrate Judge for further consideration of Plaintiff's remaining excessive force claim. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 3/19/15. (crt,Crawford, A)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
RANDY WRIGHT
LA. DOC #603329

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-3130

VERSUS

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

JAMES M. LeBLANC, ET AL.

MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT
For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Ruling and for those additional reasons set forth in
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 8], to the extent adopted by the Court
after a de novo review of the record,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend/Correct the Complaint [Doc. No. 10] is
GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that his Motion to Appoint Counsel [Doc. No. 12] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, AND ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that all of Plaintiff’s
claims EXCEPT his excessive force claim are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and
for failure to state a claim.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Request for Production of
Documents [Doc. No. 11] is DENIED at this time, subject to review by the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for

further consideration of Plaintiff’s remaining excessive force claim.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 19th day of March, 2015.

2