Antley v. Darden et al

Filing 43

MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 42 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 6/10/16. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION MICKEY WAYNE ANTLEY * CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-3307 SEC. P. VERSUS * JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES DEPUTY SLADE DARDEN, ET AL. * MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES MEMORANDUM ORDER This is a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in which Plaintiff Mickey Wayne Antley (“Antley”) brought claims against Defendants for the alleged use of excessive force and violations of his Fourth Amendment rights. On May 6, 2016, the Court issued a Judgment [Doc. No. 41] adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and denying Antley’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 33]. On June 8, 2016, Antley filed a “Request for Certificate of Appealability” [Doc. No. 42]. The Court must consider whether to grant or deny a certificate of appealability after a final judgment issues in a habeas case. This is not a habeas case, and no final judgment has issued. As Antley is acting pro se, the Court has considered whether he may be seeking leave to file an interlocutory appeal. However, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1292, Antley has failed to show that the Court’s Judgment “involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.” Accordingly, Antley’s Request for Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 10th day of June, 2016. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?