Union Pacific Railroad Co v. Taylor Truck Line Inc et al

Filing 35

JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling 34 and for those additional reasons in the 16 Report and Recommendation, to the extent adopted, and after a de novo review of the record, including Defendants' objections and Plaintiff's response to objections, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Compel Joinder 6 , is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 5/29/15. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0074

VERSUS

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

TAYLOR TRUCK LINE INC., ET AL

MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES
JUDGMENT

For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Ruling and for those additional reasons in the
Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to the extent adopted, and after a de novo
review of the record, including Defendants’ objections and Plaintiff’s response to objections,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Compel Joinder, [Doc. No. 6], is
DENIED.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 29th day of May, 2015.