Harris v. City of Bastrop et al

Filing 20

JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling 19 , IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to amend, contained in his memorandum in opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 14] is GRANTED. Plaintiff has 14 day s from the date of this Judgment to file an amended Complaint asserting a false arrest claim. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 11] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the extent Defe ndants move for summary judgment on Plaintiffs 42 U.S.C. § 1983 municipal liability claims, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 conspiracy claim, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claim under Louisiana law, their motion is GRANTED, and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendants motion is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff has ten days from the date of this Ruling to file an opposition memorandum to the Courts sua sponte notice of intent to dismiss his claims against the Bastrop Police Department. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 7/19/16. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION

BRYSAN HARRIS

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0761

VERSUS

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

CITY OF BASTROP, ET AL.

MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT
For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Ruling,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to amend, contained in his memorandum in
opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 14] is GRANTED. Plaintiff
has 14 days from the date of this Judgment to file an amended Complaint asserting a false arrest
claim.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment [Doc. No. 11] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the extent Defendants
move for summary judgment on Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 municipal liability claims, 42 U.S.C.
§ 1985 conspiracy claim, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claim under Louisiana law,
their motion is GRANTED, and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendants’
motion is otherwise DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff has ten days from the date of this Ruling to file
an opposition memorandum to the Court’s sua sponte notice of intent to dismiss his claims against

the Bastrop Police Department.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 19th day of July, 2016.

2