Scott v. Smith et al

Filing 17

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 11 Report and Recommendation re 1 Complaint filed by John Howard Scott. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs civil rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Remove [Doc. No. 15] is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff may seek relief from any appropriate state court on his state law claims. The Clerk of Court is instructed to send a copy of this Order/Judgment to the keeper of the Three Strikes List in Tyler, Texas. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 6/30/15. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION JOHN HOWARD SCOTT CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0823 VERSUS JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES JOHN SMITH, ET AL. MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record and for those additional reasons stated in this Court’s Ruling, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s civil rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remove [Doc. No. 15] is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff may seek relief from any appropriate state court on his state law claims. The Clerk of Court is instructed to send a copy of this Order/Judgment to the keeper of the Three Strikes List in Tyler, Texas. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 30th day of June, 2015.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?