Alexander v. Nixon

Filing 21

JUDGMENT adopting 20 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 10] filed by Defendant Christine W. Nixon is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff Matthew Edward Alexanders state law defamation claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature, but his state law tort claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and false arrest/wrongful imprisonment are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 2/3/16. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION MATTHEW EDWARD ALEXANDER * CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2300 VERSUS * JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES CHRISTINE W. NIXON * MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES JUDGMENT The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 10] filed by Defendant Christine W. Nixon is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff Matthew Edward Alexander’s state law defamation claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature, but his state law tort claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and false arrest/wrongful imprisonment are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 3rd day of February, 2016.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?