Luv N Care Ltd v. Groupo Rimar

Filing 25

JUDGMENT granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. To the extent Defendant moves the Court to dismiss Plaintiffs claims on res judicata grounds, the motion is GRANTED. The motion is otherwise DENIED. Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 5/13/16. (crt,Crawford, A)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
LUV N’ CARE, LTD.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2349

VERSUS

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

GROUPO RIMAR, AKA SUAVINEX

MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT
For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Ruling and the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge, to the extent adopted, and having considered the entire record in this matter,
including the written objections and responses to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant’s “Motion to
Dismiss, or in the Alternative Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings” [Doc. No. 4] is
GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the extent Defendant moves the Court to dismiss
Plaintiff’s claims on res judicata grounds, the motion is GRANTED. The motion is otherwise
DENIED. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 13th day of May, 2016.