Terral v. Ducote et al
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 81 Motion to Vacate. 78 Judgment is VACATED and this case is RE-OPENED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 68 Motion for Summary Judgment is re-set and referred to Magistrate Judge Hayes for report and recommendation. Plaintiff's response to the Motion for Summary Judgment is due by 6/21/17. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 5/31/2017. (crt,Crawford, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
BRENDAN MATTHEW TERRAL
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2366
JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES
WARDEN DUCOTE, ET AL.
MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES
This is a prisoner civil rights case filed by Plaintiff Brendan Matthew Terral (“Terral”) on
September 14, 2015. After conducting an initial review, Magistrate Judge Karen L. Hayes
ordered Terral to filed an amended complaint. He complied with that order and, after reviewing
the Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 8], Magistrate Judge Hayes ordered the lawsuit to be served
on Defendants. With leave of Court, Terral filed another Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 27] on
June 23, 2016.
On July 23, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 36] claims against
On November 30, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No.
On December 13, 2016, the Court adopted the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate
Judge Hayes, granted the Motion to Dismiss, and dismissed the claims against the Jackson Parish
Correctional Center, the Jackson Parish Sheriff’s Department, and Jackson Parish. The claims
remained pending against the individual Defendants.
On March 3, 2017, Magistrate Judge Hayes issued an order to Terral to show cause why
his lawsuit should not be dismissed for failing to comply with her February 9, 2017 Order [Doc.
No. 71] to file an updated statement of issues, or alternatively, a response to Defendants’ motion
for summary judgment by February 23, 2017. [Doc. No. 72]. Terral did not respond, and, on
March 29, 2017, Magistrate Judge Hayes issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 73]
recommending that the Court dismiss Terral’s lawsuit for failure to comply with her order.
On April 7 and 10, 2017, the Clerk of Court received notices that mail addressed to Terral
at Jackson Parish Correctional Center had been returned as undeliverable. [Doc. Nos. 76 & 77].
On May 11, 2017, the Court adopted Magistrate Judge Hayes’ Report and
Recommendation and dismissed Terral’s lawsuit. [Doc. No. 78].
Six days later, on May 17, 2017, Terral filed a notice of change of address with the Clerk
On May 30, 2017, Terral filed the instant motion [Doc. No. 81] to vacate or set aside the
Court’s May 11, 2017 Judgment, explaining that he had not been receiving his legal mail, had not
received a notice that the Motion for Summary Judgment had been filed, and did not know
notices were being returned to the Court. As soon as he received his mail, Terral filed a notice of
change of address with the Court. He further states that he intends to pursue his case if the Court
will allow him to do so.
Based on the reasons stated, the Court finds good cause to grant the relief requested and
notes the lack of prejudice to Defendants given the timeliness of Terral’s filing. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Terral’s motion [Doc. No. 81] is GRANTED, the Court’s
Judgment [Doc. No. 78] is VACATED, and this case is RE-OPENED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgement [Doc.
No. 68] is also RE-SET on the Court’s calendar and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Hayes for
report and recommendation. Terral shall have twenty-one (21) days from the date of this
Memorandum Order, or until June 21, 2017, to file, by placing in the prison mailing system, an
opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment or an updated statement of issues for Magistrate
Judge Hayes’ consideration prior to issuance of a report and recommendation. If Terral fails to
comply with the deadline, the Court may again dismiss his case for failure to prosecute and/or
comply with the orders of Court.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 31st day of May, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?