Smith v. Monroe Warehouse Co et al

Filing 30

JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling 29 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Monroe Warehouse Companys (MWC) Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 15] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the extent that MWC moves for summary judgment on Plaintiff Dietra Smiths claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., the motion is GRANTED, and those claims against MWC are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. To the extent that MWC moves for summary judgment on any state law claims against it, the motion is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is hereby REMANDED to the Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Ouachita, State of Louisiana, for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 10/20/16. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
DIETRA SMITH

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2396

VERSUS

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

CHRIS AVERETTE, ET AL.

MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES
JUDGMENT

For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Ruling,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Monroe Warehouse Company’s
(“MWC”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 15] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN
PART. To the extent that MWC moves for summary judgment on Plaintiff Dietra Smith’s claims
under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., the motion is
GRANTED, and those claims against MWC are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. To the extent
that MWC moves for summary judgment on any state law claims against it, the motion is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is hereby REMANDED to the Fourth Judicial
District Court, Parish of Ouachita, State of Louisiana, for all further proceedings.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 20th day of October, 2016.