Evergreen Flying Services Inc et al v. Town of Rayville et al

Filing 37

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 23 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 7] filed by Defendants Town of Rayville, Mayor Harry Lewis, and James Smith is GRANTED IN of Plaintiffs federal law claims, the motion is GRANTED, and those claims are dismissed. To the extent that Defendants move for the dismissal of Plaintiffs state law claims, the motion is DENIED. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims. I T IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs state law claims are REMANDED to the Fifth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Richland, State of Louisiana. The Clerk of Court is directed to certify a copy of this judgment and forward the same to the Clerk of the Fifth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Richland, State of Louisiana. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 5/19/16. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
EVERGREEN FLYING SERVICES,
INC., ET AL.

*

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2574

VERSUS

*

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

THE TOWN OF RAYVILLE, ET AL.

*

MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together
with the written objections and responses thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review
of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is correct and that
judgment as recommended therein is warranted and for those additional reasons set forth in the
Court’s Ruling,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the motion to dismiss [Doc. No.
7] filed by Defendants Town of Rayville, Mayor Harry Lewis, and James Smith is GRANTED IN
PART and DENIED IN PART. To the extent that Defendants move for the dismissal of Plaintiffs’
federal law claims, the motion is GRANTED, and those claims are dismissed. To the extent that
Defendants move for the dismissal of Plaintiffs’ state law claims, the motion is DENIED. The
Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ state law claims are REMANDED to the
Fifth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Richland, State of Louisiana. The Clerk of Court is
directed to certify a copy of this judgment and forward the same to the Clerk of the Fifth Judicial

District Court for the Parish of Richland, State of Louisiana.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 19th day of May, 2016.

2