Henderson v. Office Depot Inc

Filing 37

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 34 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Office Depot, Inc.s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) [Doc. No. 27] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED I N PART. To the extent that Plaintiff asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1986, the motion is GRANTED, and those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motion is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 11/10/16. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
JOSEPH HENDERSON, SR.

*

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2907

VERSUS

*

JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES

OFFICE DEPOT, INC.

*

MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered,
together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of
the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is correct and that
judgment as recommended therein is warranted,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Office Depot, Inc.’s
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) [Doc. No. 27]
is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. To the extent that Plaintiff asserts claims
under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1986, the motion is GRANTED, and those claims are DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motion is otherwise DENIED.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 10th day of November, 2016.