Filing 2

ORDER denying 1 Motion For The Issuance of Article 66 Subpoena. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 3/27/15. (crt,Crawford, A)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION IN RE DOUGLAS H KATES, JR CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-mc-00007 MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES MEMORANDUM ORDER Before the undersigned Magistrate Judge is a Motion “for the Issuance of Article 66 Subpoena,” [doc. #1], filed by pro se Movant Douglas H. Kates, Jr. Movant asks the Court, pursuant to LA . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 66, to order the Clerk of Court to issue subpoenas so that he can obtain various documents “relevant to ongoing criminal and civil litigations” in state court. Id. at 1. Movant’s invocation of LA . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 66 is manifestly erroneous. Article 66 authorizes Louisiana state courts, upon motion of the attorney general or district attorney, to issue subpoenas ordering persons to appear for questioning by the attorney general or district attorney. The provision clearly does not apply here. Aside from that, and more importantly, the instant Motion is not properly before the Court. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(a)(2) states that a “subpoena must issue from the court where the action is pending.” Movant’s subpoena request is not related to any pending action in this Court. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Movant’s request for the issuance of subpoenas, [doc. # 1], is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court close this miscellaneous proceeding. In Chambers, Monroe, Louisiana, this 27th day of March, 2015. __________________________________ KAREN L. HAYES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?