Davis v. Deville
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 24 Report and Recommendations, dismissing 1 Complaint filed by Roger Dale Davis, Jr with prejudice.Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 11/30/2017. (crt,McDonnell, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ROGER DALE DAVIS, JR.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0358
JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.
WARDEN KEITH DEVILLE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been
considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a
de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted,
IT IS ORDERED that Roger Dale Davis, Jr.’s Petition (Record Document 1) is
hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings for the U.S. District
Courts requires the district court to issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it
enters a final order adverse to the applicant. The Court, after considering the record in
this case and the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. Section 2253, denies a certificate of
appealability. Jurists of reason would not find it debatable whether the petition states a
valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and whether this court was correct in its
procedural ruling. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484,120 S.Ct. 1595, 1604 (2000).
THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Shreveport, Louisiana, on this the 30th day of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?