Courville v. Smith et al
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 54 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Denying 32 Motion for Summary Judgment, 36 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. It is further ordered that this matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge to hold an evidentiary hearing on exhaustion and on the merits, and thereafter, to issue findings to the court, via report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 11/22/2017. (crt,Crawford, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
CHASE M. COURVILLE
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0684
JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES
WARDEN SMITH, ET AL.
MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered,
together with the written objections and responses thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de
novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction [Doc. No. 36] and the
parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 32 & 42] are DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge
to hold an evidentiary hearing on exhaustion (if defendants continue to maintain that defense)
and on the merits (to include all witnesses and evidence to be presented by all parties), and
thereafter, to issue findings to the court, via report and recommendation.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 22nd day of November, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?