Naylor v. Harrell et al

Filing 37

JUDGMENT ADOPTING Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that 32 Plaintiff's Voluntary Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 12 , 15 , 17 , & 19 M otions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Lucille Walker, Dewey Allen, William Scott Hunt, and Lee Harrell are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiffs ineffective assistance of counsel claim is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 1/31/17. (crt,Crawford, A)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION NAFESSA H. NAYLOR CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0817 VERSUS JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES LEE HARRELL, ET AL. MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in the Ruling and for those additional reasons in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which this Court has adopted, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion Requesting Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice [Doc. No. 32] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted, FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) [Doc Nos. 12, 15, 17, & 19], filed by Defendants Attorney General Jeff Landry, Judge Terry Doughty, State Trooper Daniel Grisson, James Berry, Michael Wilson, James Adcock and Lt. Terry Parrish are GRANTED, and Plaintiff Nafeesa Naylor’s claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Lucille Walker, Dewey Allen, William Scott Hunt, and Lee Harrell are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 31st day of January, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?