Busby et al v. Palmer

Filing 23

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 19 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that 9 Motion to Dismiss is CONVERTED to a Motion for a More Definitive Statement and is Granted In Part and Denied In Part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs must amend their Complaint within 30 days. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 7/18/2017. (crt,Crawford, A)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION TED BUSBY, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-0494 VERSUS JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES KEITH PALMER D/B/A PALMER CONSTRUCTION MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein [Doc. No. 19], finding that the Magistrate Judge correctly stated and applied the law, and noting the lack of objections to the Report and Recommendation, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 9] is CONVERTED to a Motion for a More Definitive Statement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e). The converted motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that Defendant moves for a more definite statement regarding “when” and “where” the allegedly fraudulent statements were made. The motion is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs must amend their Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Judgment to allege their fraud claims with more particularity. If Plaintiffs fail to do so, their fraud claims will be dismissed. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 18th day of July, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?