Williams v. Post et al

Filing 21

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 11 Report and Recommendations, dismissing Williams' complaint with prejudice as frivolous for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted and for seeking monetary damages against a defendant who is immune from such relief pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC Sec 1915. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 9/27/2017. (crt,McDonnell, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION ROY A. WILLIAMS CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-0767-P VERSUS JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR. DAVID F. POST, ET AL MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES JUDGMENT Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. See Record Document 11. Pro se plaintiff Roy A. Williams (“Williams”) filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and also filed a Motion for Leave to File Amended Civil Rights Complaint. See Record Documents 15 & 16. The Court holds that the objections are without merit and that the Motion for Leave to File Amended Civil Rights Complaint should be DENIED, as the proposed amendment is futile. Accordingly, for the reasons assigned in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and having thoroughly reviewed the record, including the written objections (Record Document 15) filed, and concurring with the findings of the Magistrate Judge under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File Amended Civil Rights Complaint (Record Document 16) be and is hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Williams’ complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous, for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted, and for seeking monetary damages against a defendant who is immune from such relief pursuant to pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.§ 1915. THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, this the 27th day of September, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?