Briggs v. Norred et al
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 10 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Dismissing 6 Complaint as frivolous and for failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice to their being asserted again until the Heck v. Humphrey conditions aremet. Order denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel; Order denying as futile 11 Motion to Amend. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 12/7/2017. (crt,Crawford, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
JAPHUS L. BRIGGS
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-01134
JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES
JEFFREY NORRED, ET AL.
MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
adopted by the Court after a de novo review of the record, and for those additional reasons set
forth in this Court’s Ruling,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel [Doc. No. 2] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend [Doc. No. 11] is
DENIED AS FUTILE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Complaint is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failing to state a claim for which relief
may be granted pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff’s claims are
dismissed with prejudice to their being asserted again until the Heck v. Humphrey conditions are
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 7th day of December, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?