Watson et al v. Arkoma Development L L C et al
JUDGMENTadopting 25 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, denying 12 Motion to Remand and 12 Motion for Attorney Fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the State of Louisiana is not a party to this litigationand that any reference to the State of Louisiana as a party in this litigation shall be removed. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 3/13/2018. (crt,Crawford, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
W. BROOKS WATSON, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1331
JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES
ARKOMA DEVELOPMENT, LLC, ET AL.
MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES
For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
[Doc. No. 25], and after a de novo review of the entire record, including Plaintiffs’ objection and
Defendants’ responses, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge’s findings under applicable
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Remand [Doc. No.
12] filed by Plaintiffs W. Brooks Watson, Ben M. Watson, Scott H. Watson, and Touchdown
Holdings, LLC, is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the State of Louisiana is not a party to this litigation
and that any reference to the State of Louisiana as a party in this litigation shall be removed.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 13th day of March, 2018.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?