Davis v. Ouachita Correctional Center et al
Filing
13
JUDGMENT adopting 10 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. It Is Ordered that Plaintiff's claims on behalf of other prisoners are Dismissed without prejudice for lack of standing and as frivolous. It Is Further Ordered that, w ith the exception of Plaintiff's conditions-of-confinement claims against Sheriff Jay Russell and Warden Pat Johnson concerning mold, mildew, fungus, and bacteria, Plaintiffs remaining claims are Dismissed With Prejudice as frivolous and for failing to state claims on which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Terry A Doughty on 10/9/2019. (crt,Crawford, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
TONY D. DAVIS
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-0841
SECTION P
VS.
JUDGE TERRY A. DOUGHTY
OUACHITA CORRECTIONAL
CENTER, ET AL.
MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES
JUDGMENT
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered,
together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of
the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is correct and that
judgment as recommended therein is warranted,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, to the extent Plaintiff Tony D.
Davis raises claims on behalf of other prisoners, the claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for lack of standing and as frivolous.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, with the
exception of Plaintiff’s conditions-of-confinement claims against Sheriff Jay Russell and Warden
Pat Johnson concerning mold, mildew, fungus, and bacteria, Plaintiff’s remaining claims are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failing to state claims on which relief
may be granted.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 9th day of October, 2019.
______________________________________
TERRY A. DOUGHTY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?